In medical malpractice cases, you need to hire a skilled lawyer to take on your case. Since they are so complex hire Gogel Law Firm a St Charles medical malpractice law firm to help you. They understand how complicated these cases can be and what needs to be proven.
Causation is usually the most difficult element to prove in a medical malpractice lawsuit. There are two types of causation that must be proved: cause-in-fact and proximate (legal) cause.
To prove cause-in-fact, the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s actions were the actual cause of the injury. This requires proving that, but for the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff would not have been injured in the St Charles hospital.
Proving proximate cause is more difficult. Even if the plaintiff can prove that the defendant’s actions were the actual cause of the injury, he or she must also show that the injury was a foreseeable result of the defendant’s actions. In other words, the plaintiff must show that it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant’s actions could result in the type of injury suffered by the plaintiff. If you think you have a case contact a St Charles medical malpractice lawyer as soon as you can.
There are many different ways to prove causation in a medical malpractice case. Some common methods include:
Medical records: Medical records can be used to prove both cause-in-fact and proximate causation. For example, if a patient’s medical records show that he or she had a specific condition that was not treated by the defendant's doctor and that the untreated condition led to the plaintiff’s injury, then the medical records would be strong evidence of both causations.